insights you can use |
|
|
"Poor management can increase software costs more rapidly than any other factor." (Barry Boehm) Behind Closed Doors: Secrets of Great Management (Pragmatic Programmers) Archives May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 Contents (c) 2003-2006 Esther Derby I also publish a quarterly newsletter for people who manage in software organizations. If you'd like to receive the newsletter, drop me an email. It's on paper, so please include surface coordinates - name and full address.
Syndicate this site (XML)
Links |
Sunday, December 07, 2003
Reframing
I spent a couple of days with Charlie and Edie Seashore last week. The were in town through the local Organization Development Network. The Seashores are elders in the arena of change, diversity, and working with groups. They are also co-authors, with Jerry Weinberg, of "What Did You Say? The Art of Giving and Receiving Feedback" (a must read for anyone who ever has to give feedback to peers, subordinates, managers, family members, friends, spouses, or children - which covers most of us, I think). Here's one of the concepts we worked with: We all have different frames of reference which help us navigate, but can also get in the way. When we can shift the frame, we can open up more options for approaching a situation. Here's the exercise. Here's part of my list: Valued characteristic ---> opposite ---> reframe smart --->dumb---> ignorant hard-working---> lazy --->relaxed persistent--->easily defeated --->cutting losses Two things stand out right for me: I can be kinder to myself when I have the option of thinking of myself in the third column vs. the second column when I'm not at my best. Most of us find some people "difficult." Very often, I describe people I find challenging using words from my second column. They represent parts of myself I don't particularly like. When I can think of them using a positive reframe, I have more options for the relationship. If you manage people who fit your middle column, try shifting to the reframe column, and see what happens. | |